On this page
How to raise a concern
Concerns about a practitioner and about an education/training provider or course all use the same online form. Concerns about the JCCP itself are made by email.
Who can raise concerns?
As well as patients/clients who have received aesthetic treatments, any member of the public, and anyone who works (or has worked) in the non-surgical cosmetic or hair restoration surgery sector can raise concerns; this includes contractors, product manufacturers, insurers, pharmacists, education and training providers and any other interested party.
What concerns can I raise?
You can raise a concern about any risk, malpractice or wrongdoing you think may harm patients/clients. Just a few examples might include (but are by no means restricted to):
- Complaints about the JCCP and its appointed Trustees and the manner in which the Council discharges its functions and responsibilities.
- Unsafe patient/client care or treatment experience.
- Unsafe working/premises standards.
- Inadequate induction or training for practitioners.
- Lack of, or poor response to a reported patient safety incident.
- Breaches of equality standards.
- Matters relating to inappropriate advertising of services or educational provision.
- Unacceptable experiences relating to dignity and respect.
- Breaches in information governance or data sharing/confidentiality.
- Unacceptable performance by one of the JCCP’s approved education and training providers/awarding bodies.
The JCCP Registrar will determine if the matter of concern raised is an appropriate matter to be dealt with by the JCCP.
All complaints about Registrants will be referred to the Chair of the JCCP Practitioner Register Committee for consideration and action.
Guidance
It is often stressful to raise a concern or to complain - this guidance is designed to help you present your issue of concern.
The JCCP assesses and monitors regulated aesthetic practitioners who offer non-surgical aesthetic treatments to ensure they are appropriately qualified, experienced and trained to practise safely. Practitioners accepted onto the JCCP Register (Registrants) agree to practise in accordance with the JCCP/CPSA Code of Practice, which is focused on patient safety and public protection. The needs of patients/clients are the Council’s first priority.
Both the JCCP and its Registrants are required to be open about what they do and have a duty of candour to respect and respond candidly to your concerns. If you believe you have not been well treated, it is best that you say so, so that the problem can be reviewed with the aim of resolution for you (and with you), and so that everyone can learn how to improve and do better in the future.
The JCCP provides two public registers
Values of the JCCP
The JCCP also has a duty of candour to ensure that it conducts its business in accordance with its Constitutional responsibilities, Company Law, and the governance requirements of the UK Charity Commission. The JCCP ‘Mission’ places public protection and patient safety at the core of its activities. The JCCP has set out its values against which its functions may be judged and held to account:
Protecting the public
We discharge our responsibility to protect members of the Public by:
Support, and no reprisals
It is natural that you might feel worried about raising a concern. The JCCP understands this and will take your concerns seriously, look into what you say and provide you with the support, advice and guidance to raise your concern.
The JCCP will not tolerate the harassment or victimisation of anyone raising a concern, nor will we tolerate any attempt to dissuade you from raising a concern. Such behaviour would be a breach of our values as an organisation and, if your concern/complaint is upheld following our investigation, this could result in disciplinary action being taken by the JCCP’s Fitness to Practise team against the Registrant concerned.
Raising a concern is seen by the JCCP, and by its Registrants and Education and Training providers, as a positive and helpful thing to do. Whatever the result of your complaint, there will never be a backlash or reprisal - more likely there will be thanks for helping to improve service user experience and the quality of services in the non-surgical aesthetic sector.
Who deals with your concern
The concerns we investigate
The JCCP accepts all concerns about its registrants. However, more serious concerns that could pose a risk to public safety and which may indicate a breach of our ‘Code of Conduct’ may need to be referred to the JCCP Fitness to Practice Committee for investigation. This committee is independent of the JCCP’s internal governance systems and is committed to acting impartially.
The test or ‘threshold’ for referral is, in the first instance, the JCCP Code of Practice. Where non-compliance with the Code presents a concern of sufficient risk, including all issues of public protection against JCCP standards relating to competence and malpractice, the matter is referred to the JCCP Fitness to Practice Committee for investigation. The following concerns typically meet the threshold for such investigation:
If the JCCP determines that any of the above thresholds have not been met, we undertake to provide written justification for our decision.
The JCCP will also consider health concerns, including for example substance abuse and alcohol dependency, where there may be a risk of harm. It is aware that some concerns may also cause reputational damage to both the JCCP and the Registrant’s profession, and considers this when reviewing complaints against the thresholds.
When a complaint does not meet the threshold for referral, the JCCP may still ask the registrant to undertake improvement action and/or advise them how to improve their conduct, and expects them to reflect, demonstrate insight, understand the rationale for improvement and reaffirm their commitment to comply with the JCCP Code of Practice. These outcomes are communicated to the complainant, along with the basis for the decisions taken.
How we publish outcomes
It is an important feature of public protection that a member of the public can make safe choices. If a registrant receives a sanction after an investigation, the JCCP publishes the sanction in line with the JCCP publication procedure for fitness to practise and registration outcomes.
What should I do if I am dissatisfied with the outcome of my complaint?
Complainants are invited to initiate the following appeals process after a decision has been made by the JCCP on the outcome of a previously presented complaint. For example:
- A complainant has been told that the JCCP will not follow up the concern as it does not meet their definition of a ‘complaint’.
- A complainant is dissatisfied with the speed of the follow up process.
- The JCCP has completed its investigation of the complaint follow up and the complainant is dissatisfied with the outcome.
The appeals process
Confidentiality
We hope you will feel comfortable raising your concern openly, but you may want to raise it confidentially - your identity is known to the JCCP but to no one else. The JCCP will keep your identity confidential and process your personal data in line with its privacy notice, if that is what you want, unless required to disclose it by law (for example, by the police).
You can choose to raise your concern anonymously, without disclosing your name, but that will make it difficult for the JCCP to investigate thoroughly and to provide you with feedback on the outcome of any investigations.
These guidelines are written in support of the JCCP values and mission. Implementation April 2023; reviewed May 2026.
